Inscrutable
Land Laws And Non-Existent Property Rights
There was a news report in the
paper yesterday about people in Manali (a suburb of North Chennai) waking up to
find that the water supplied by the Chennai Corporation's Metrowater department
having a dark oily smell and being unfit to drink. On further investigation by
intrepid journalists, it was confirmed that the drinking water line was
contaminated from a leaking oil pipeline carrying fuel - crude oil- from the
madras port to the refinery at Ennore. So in effect what those people that day
in Manali had received through their taps was diesel and petrol.
This immediately brought to mind
another story i had heard from a friend of mine about an uncle of his who lived
in Perambur in the heart of Chennai and who having found that the erratic water
supply by Corporation's Metrowater department was insufficient for daily needs
had dug a bore well in his backyard to get extra groundwater. But not finding
water at shallower levels -(the groundwater levels in Chennai having gone down
because of competitive deep well digging from all those apartment complexes
being constructed by breaking down individual residences)the poor man had dug
deeper and deeper and had at last to his astonishment found his well shaft
spouting crude oil, like something from Saudi Arabia.
The uncle being a prudent man had
immediately instructed the work men to close up the well secretly and proceeded
to dig a new well for the water. The explanation that he gave for closing that
well was that if news had leaked out about petrol being found in his land he
would be a beggar in two days for the government would turn him out of his
house mercilessly and take over his property and break it down for the oil.
This might have been a true story or this might be just an apocryphal story, i
cant say, but it touches the crux of what I am going to discuss in this post -
namely the Right to property for an Indian citizen.
There is a concept in law called
Eminent Domain. The law of eminent domain means everything is the property of
the state and the people are allowed to use it only under the indulgence of the
government. This law has been with us since the time of kings and feudalism
when people held lands because the king permitted them to do so in his
discretion. If the king or the government required that particular land for
their own use - say to construct a new road or a flyover through that land-
they have first call on the land. They can take over the property from the
owner and the individual cannot refuse to give it up.
When the British came to India and
stated writing our laws for us poor ignorant Indians, they not only retained
the law of eminent domain but even expanded it to make sure that when the
government acquired any private property, the owner of the land had no say in
it but to accept the compensation given- often meager amounts and leave
silently. This law - the Land Acquisition Act was first passed by the British
in the 1890's to make sure that the Indians followed their rules as per British
law. As time passed the British Law was changed in Britain itself and the
English people acquired rights over their property. But in India the same law
was there till independence - in fact that same Land Acquisition Act is even
now in existence in India - even after 140 years after it was first enacted.
During our freedom struggle there
were lots of struggles for land all over India- even Mahatma Gandhi
participated in one of them called Champaran- so when we at last got our
freedom, our constitution drafting committee decided to include the Right to
Property as a Fundamental Right under the twin Articles 19(1-F)and 31. But the
intelligence of the Constitution drafting committee headed by Dr.Ambedkar was
often negated by the stupidity of Nehruvian Socialism. The Socialists inside
the Congress Government used the Land Acquisition Act/Land Ceiling Act to take
over private property for public use by targeting the Zamindars and others who
had excess land. This was the origin of the Benami problems as the large land
owners often split their property into small bits and gave them to their
benamis - like distant relatives- to escape their lands being taken over.
Meanwhile some of the religious
trusts and swamijis who owned large temple lands in the name of trusts filed
cases in Supreme Court against the government forcibly taking over their lands.
The most famous of these cases was Swami Kesavananda Bharati's case where the Supreme
Court had to interfere to control the government’s destruction of our original
constitution with new amendments- especially in land cases. Because the
governments started taking away private lands for more and more reasons there were
a lot of cases being filed in the courts by the landowners who were affected.
The courts often gave judgment for the landowners because under the
constitution- individuals had a right to their own property as a fundamental
right.
This irritated the then prime
minister Indira Gandhi and in her autocratic way she used the Emergency to
remove the Right to property as a fundamental right and included it as a legal
right under Art.300-A - the difference being under the old law- right to
property was inviolable- no one can take over your land without your consent
but under the new law if someone takes over your land you can file a case in
the court and ask for compensation for
your lost land and wait till the courts decide if you are eligible for
compensation and how much to give you- a process which might take decades in
Indian courts.
In addition to removing the
constitutional right under Articles 19 and Articles 31 guaranteeing protection
to private property the left leaning (commie-loving) Congress government
proceeded to do a lot of damage to other Constitution and fundamental rights -
some of which were set right by the Supreme Court subsequently after the
emergency period was over and Indira Gandhi's Congress party was defeated in
the next elections in 1977 and a new government under the Janata Party came to
power. But like all politicians they too saw the advantages of having control
over other peoples lands and opted to retain the same illogical laws changed
during the emergency period.
So what it all comes down to in
the end is that as per law of the land, your land belongs not to you but to the
government. The government out of its good heart allows you to temporarily own
and use the land- the land all its appurtenances - or ground and all its
belongings- above the ground or below the ground. So if you happen to dig into
your land and find diamonds or petrol don’t start imagining that you can soon
become a South African diamond king or a Texas oil millionaire like they show
on movies.
For that to happen, you have to
live in a real democracy like the United States of America where individual
rights are respected. Here in India, some nameless clerk in a office somewhere
will make the decision to take over your land for a paltry compensation- say
for example if the land in your area goes for around Rs.10,000 a square foot then
the government will gave you a standard rate of compensation of rs100 a square
foot for your land. If you had just bought a 1000 square feet flat/apartment in
a posh area for Rs.One Crore and for your misfortune you happen to be sitting
on an oil well, you will been given Rs.Ten Thousand and asked to get out of
there.
That’s what you get for living in
a land where individual rights are sacrificed in the name of socialist ideals
and community good. But all this idealism is only when you are the land owner,
try being on the other side - being a land buyer and you will see that the same
land rules will work differently again - as i will explain in my next post. So
if you find an oil well on your land- close it. If you dig up diamonds in your
land- bury it. If you find old pottery and bits of archaeological stuff- plant
a garden over it and forget it all. That’s the only way to retain ownership of
your land for yourself till you die.
To conclude, the law of Eminent
domain is supreme in our land. If the king wants something- the king gets it.
But the tragedy is that the king is no longer a single person- oh no, for we
are far more advanced and we have now a democracy. Which means that every
Politician and every bureaucrat is now a king in our great democracy and if
they want your land - they will take it- legally, lawfully and fully as per
rules and there is nothing you or anyone else can do about it. This is the
stark reality of life in India under our land laws.
Very informative, keep posting such good articles, it really helps to know about things.
ReplyDelete