Validating Love
And Other Misconceptions.
Ever since
the concept of Valentine’s Day, a day dedicated solely to love, started gaining
prominence in our conservative society there has been a lot of hue and cry made
over love. There have been anti-love groups, the so called Romeo squads roaming
around the cities trying to catch people who are making love to each other in public
spaces and in quid pro quo, the mushrooming
pro-love groups who have been trying to reclaim the public spaces for
private acts, in this case kissing in public to cock-a-snook at the guardians
of public morality who feel threatened by these lewd acts in public to which
children might get accidentally exposed and heaven forbid, grow up believing
that snogging in public is not anathema in our day to day life. Much as I
sympathize with those who have no immediate access to a private space to
conduct private business (I wouldn’t call the marina beach entirely private,
although it does offer some space) I am forced to agree with the guardians of
our morality and say “get a room guys” for some things are just too icky to be
done in public- wet slobbering kisses hidden under dupattas for instance.
Which
brings me to the primary point of this post- who was the bright spark who
decided that love has to be celebrated with kissing? I would understand if valentine’s
day was a day declared as a kissing day and then people celebrated it by
kissing each other (and random strangers, if permitted) in public like they
supposedly do in Central Park, New York (disclaimer: the farthest I have been
to is Nanganallur, so I don’t actually have any evidence they do this in New
York, just hearsay from click bait news sites). But for a day dedicated to celebrating
love, why do you have to validate love by making kissing as a proof of concept?
This and other misconceptions on love are what I am going to discuss in my next
few thousand words, so if you are already feeling bored, go take a nap and come
back for the climax.
In my
humble opinion (there- I said it, even though I believe that my opinion is
anything but humble) the crux of this entire problem lies in equating love with
marriage. With marriage and its
attendant burdens like chastity, fidelity, honesty etc. Love, independent love,
is fettered with chains by insisting on it being directed solely with the
purpose of gaining or retaining a mate. No longer does our society permit us to
love inanimate things (say a Bugatti Veyron) or cross-species love (your
favorite pet dog) or even love for nature- when you are captivated by a
beautiful sunset and just can’t turn away from the glorious sight of the sun
sinking slowly into the sea. But no, those are not claimed as love nowadays,
love means solely between man and woman geared towards marriage or sex.
So let me
reiterate my point again –love is different, marriage is different and sex is
different. There is absolutely no natural link between these three- each can
exist quite well independently. Unfortunately our brains have been so brain
washed by society that pure love should end in a wedding that the very
definition of love has been split into “pure love” and “impure love”. The one
which ends up in shackling two people together in lifelong matrimony is
exclusively called pure love while others are termed illegal love. You are
supposed to fall in love only once in your lifetime. You are supposed to end up
marrying the person you fell in love with. And once when you are in love with
someone, you are forbidden to fall in or out of love with anyone else, even
accidentally. All these restrictions and rules have been framed to make sure
that “love stays pure”. Any deviation from these set rules is immediately
classified as crime against society.
All this
constant moral harassment by society has made large swathes of our population
believe that this is indeed love. Love means writing love letters, sending
smiley’s on instant messengers, talking nonsense for hours together, hugging
each other, kissing each other, having sex with each other and finally marrying
each other. That’s the be-all and end-all of love. And this design includes a
happy ending- a love marriage. All the
above related activities- hugging, kissing, sex are considered the perks of
love and hence more and more people believe that this is what love is all
about. And that’s why they frown on any deviation from the set template –like
loving more than one person at the same time or loving one person while having
sex with another person etc. all of which are labeled as not pure love. Those
who believe in such drivel -that kissing or sex is equal to love will never
ever realize what love is all about.
True love,
false love, pure love, impure love, legal love, illegal love- so many labels
for what is just a simple emotion- an expression of happiness that someone else
brings into our lives. In fact, you don’t even need the presence of anyone else
to experience love- just your thoughts and memories will suffice- a smile on
your face when you can recall that beautiful stranger you bumped into yesterday
at the supermarket is also love if you broaden the definition of love. Its love
when your dog rushes up to lick your face when you come home at the end of the
day. Its love even when you express your love to someone else and they turn you
down flat- that single second of suspense when your heart soars high in
anticipation- that too is love. Love is
just that- an emotion. Don’t make it into something it is not. Don’t hang too
many things on it. Don’t make it mandatory to end up in a wedding for it to be
love. Just let it be as it is and leave it to two people to decide how they
want it to be.
Finally I
would ask you to look up into the sky and tell me what you see- some will see
the long dark night sky with its infinite darkness. Some will see the stars
twinkling bright- scattered here and there. And some will see the full moon –
dominating the dark. Love is like that- for some it’s the darkness, for someone
else it’s the stars and for the lucky few it’s the bright silvery moon. Judge
not what each person sees- it’s their space so just leave them be. Thanks for a
patient reading- that’s if you got up to this point.
I think some of our movie directors should be shown this post.... Where heros run after heroines or vice versa asking them to "love pannu"... For heavens sake love is not a voluntary bodily action like walking or running... Its an emotion...also "see if u can stop thinking about me the whole of today" ... Please!! of course when a girl is harrassed she would be terrorized by it and its going to flood her thinking... Then the so called love failures and tasmaq associations.... Phew!!! on a serious note, a lot of nonsense they show is totally misguiding many teenagers and young people...
ReplyDeleteahaa..precisely my point...you cant "make" someone love you or viceversa- it just happens god knows why. and to justify tasmac sessions on love failure is a totally cinematic development - i dont think anyone in real life would do like that, atleast not nowadays...unfortunately our film makers are way behind the curve when it comes to showing love on screen- they prefer to perpetuate same old prejudices in the name of being with the masses - are our masses /common man really that stupid as they show in films? somehow i doubt it very much
ReplyDelete