Showing posts with label Medical Research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Medical Research. Show all posts

Friday, July 10, 2015

Sunscreens – Are You Buying Them Right?

Sunscreens – Are You Buying Them Right?



I read a very interesting research paper yesterday –published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine (read here- http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1504912) - detailing the current research trends in melanoma – a skin cancer condition. And the research paper in passing touched upon something of interest to all of us- namely how effective were sunscreens in preventing skin cancer. Now the two commonest skin cancer types are Carcinomas and Melanomas. A melanoma (often called a malignant melanoma because it spreads so easily and so fast) is a cancer of the melanin pigment producing cells of our body. Melanin is the protein which gives us our skin colour- dark or fair and and also protects us from the radiation of the sun- in effect its a natural sunscreen. Dark skinned people have an abundance of melanin pigment in their skin naturally and require lesser quantities of sunscreen to protect their skin, while fair skinned people with less melanin get tanned and sun burnt easily and also have more instances of getting skin cancer- melanomas. So with that small introduction let me get onto the meat of the matter.

 Sunscreens as we all know are classified as over the counter cosmetic products which do not need a doctors prescription. But we must remember that cosmetic companies make certain tall claims regarding sunscreens and their effects touting them as wonder drugs as they contain certain chemicals which, in effect prevent skin-tanning, anti-aging etc. Now the American Food and Drug administration has specified certain guidelines for sunscreens based on recent research

1)    Anything less than SPF- 15 is no use for cancer prevention but can only be used for anti-tanning- so this means the FDA has now effectively barred anything which uses less than 15-SPF.

2)    Anything above SPF-50 has been shown to be useless for skin protection- which means that more than that is an overkill and unnecessary.

3)    Both cream and liquid based sunscreens work equally well when applied as a coating- but all of them last for only 90 mins to 120 mins for single application- which means you are protected for one and a half to two hours only with a single application. So covering up exposed areas with adequate clothing becomes important for long term prevention. And there goes my dream of ogling at all those bikini clad beach babes.

4)    Any sunscreen which only protects against UV-A is not effective as anti-cancer but only for anti-tanning. Hence check out for the sunscreen prevents both UV-A  and also UV-B rays from affecting the skin. So only broad-spectrum sunscreens prevent  skin cancer while others are just for the beach.

5)    Ingredients like  ecamsule and enzacamene come under banned substances – no longer safe and effective and hence check out that you are using a product which no longer contains these.

6)    And finally remember that background radiation exists even indoor- so anything which promises anti-aging should protect your skin all the time and not just under direct sun exposure.


So these few pointers should help you choose the best sunscreen for avoiding skin cancer and not be taken in by the tall claims made by cosmetic companies.

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

It’s A Nutty Result



It’s A Nutty Result



There was an interesting article in last month’s New England Journal of Medicine titled - [Association of Nut Consumption with Total and Cause-Specific Mortality, N Engl J Med 2013] which talked about how eating nuts- walnuts, peanuts and hazelnuts for more than 5 times a week reduced death rates by 20%. This lowering of death rate is achieved by lowering the risk of heart disease and lowered cholesterol levels according to the study.  As the study says - nuts are nutrient dense foods rich in fiber, vitamins, minerals and anti-oxidants and all kinds of goodies. So are nuts the new miracle foods? Should we all rush out to buy nuts and start eating them?

Just hold on a bit and before we start stocking kilos of nuts at home, let’s take a closer look at the entire study again. With the current trend of sharing breaking news on social media most people just read the title and overall conclusions of any scientific study published (hyped) in the popular media - rarely do people take the time to read the entire article in full and try to understand the pitfalls in the study design or the subjects chosen. And that’s why when we take this entire study in totality we find a few queer aspects in it which might confuse these stupendous results.

First of all, the people who participated in this study (eating nuts regularly) were all nurses and doctors- so we can assume they would have taken care of their health in other ways too- like cutting out junk food and exercising regularly and eating lots of vitamins daily and so the reductions in heart problems and cholesterol might not be entirely due to the effects of the nuts, you get what I am saying? And also this study has specifically excluded those who smoke and those who are overweight which means that any results which talk about reducing heart attack risks is a bit biased towards those who are already fit and healthy and taking good care of themselves.

I mean, when you take a naturally healthy person and then say they have reduced risk of heart attacks because they ate nuts, put that way it’s not a very jaw dropping result is it? On the other hand show me a morbidly obese person who never exercises in his life but sits home watching TV and smokes 40 cigarettes a day and then tell me that eating nuts reduces his cholesterol and saves him from heart attacks and I promise to stop prescribing medicines henceforth and start writing 2walnuts/2almonds twice a day for 5 days as my prescription.

So in conclusion nuts are nutritious, beneficial and probably prevent heart attacks. But so does exercise and weight loss. And if you prefer not to go nutty do eat nuts but also try to live a stress/tension free life. Save your heart- ‘cos you only got one. Okies?

Thursday, October 31, 2013

A New Hope….The “Wow” Of Stem Cell Treatments



A New Hope….The “Wow” Of Stem Cell Treatments

Stem Cells under High Magnification

 There I was sitting in the audience of the darkened convention center staring at the slides running on the screen feeling a slight tinge of envy and an odd sense of disappointment thinking that it could have been me there presenting these results, if only. Ah, that "if only" plays a major part of all our lives doesn’t it?

Anyway to start from the beginning I had spent the last three days at a specialty national conference as part of my commitment for annual medical education to learn what’s new in the field of regeneration. Too many times we get caught up in the everyday worries of clinical practice and forget that there is a whole lot of innovation taking place out there in science some of which may be a game changer to how we practice medicine in the near future.

Take for example stem cells. Those who follow this blog regularly know that i have in the past been dismissive of what I have thought was the highly inflated claims of the stem cell propagandists in touting it as a cure for all diseases (read here and here). Well I am happy to confess that i have now changed my mind. I too believe in stem cells now. I believe that soon, very soon we might have actually workable stem cell therapies at hand- something which i would have argued against a few months ago.

There is a thin line separating skepticism and cynicism- what with all the false stuff floating around in the name of miracle cures - science needs us to be ever vigilant and skeptic and believe any claim only if it is proved or disproved with reliable evidence. But to reject the hypothesis without examining the evidence at all is a sign of a closed mind and cynical in the extreme. Thankfully I am not a cynic and if you show me the evidence and it stands rigorous examination then I am happy to change my mind and jump onto the bandwagon too. That’s the advantage of having an open mind.

As I said earlier, I sat there (for three days) in the darkened auditorium staring rapt in attention watching slide after slide of before and after treatment photographs and micro-photographs (histological slides under high magnification) of various diseases where stem cells had been used and I came away impressed. I could see jaws which had been amputated halfway- hemi-mandibulectomy done- grow back into normal jaws with stem cells. And i saw unhealed diabetic ulcers and amputation wounds close down normally with no sweat at all and I couldn’t help thinking that this stem cell therapy thing is definitely a breakthrough in medicine.

Best of all these were all mesenchymal stem cells harvested from routine menstrual blood and not embryonic stem cells with all its hassles (complicated procedures) of cord blood collection and storing even as the child is being born. That old adage of women being life givers is once again being reinforced with even their menstrual blood which is usually discarded as unsanitary -being put to life giving use. And it made me think of that quaint old Indian habit of women being considered as untouchables during their three days of menses and often set apart from the pooja rooms and other religious ceremonies. Science is now providing a fitting reply to religious obscurantism isn’t it?

If you think I am painting too rosy a picture i would be the first to agree that there are still a lot of steps to go through- there are unresolved issues in collecting the stem cells, culturing them (growing them) in the lab and making use of them in the proper way for the proper disease to get the proper result - for the cure should not be worse than the disease, right? There are also worries about stem cells helping cancer cells to grow faster along with normal cells and their cessation of growth by contact inhibition is yet to be elucidated- that is how does the stem cell know that your kidney is only this big and it stops growing further once your size is reached? What if it decides to keep on growing in size till you have the mother of all kidneys? What stops it actually? Food for thought right?

But anyway all these are technical issues and once the proof-of-concept is validated then these can be tackled by multiple people working simultaneously everywhere. Its like somebody inventing the first car and showing that it can indeed run on the road and then people everywhere get in to solve the practical issues- like one person inventing the accelerator, someone else somewhere inventing the brake and someone else inventing the gear box- none of which was possible till people believed that a car could actually run as said.

And as the researchers stressed again and again they were still only dipping their toes in using stem cells  for treatment, exploring the possibilities of its application in a blind "let’s try this and see what does happen" way and it was still in the experimental stage with no long term results available YET. But if the initial results are anything to go by then we are just that nearer to growing back lost or damaged organs- like a kidney, liver or even an amputated limb. We can hopefully cure diabetes, restore lost memory in dementia cases and even make sure that those with spinal cord injuries and paralyzed in bed can take up their beddings and walk again- as the bible says

It might take us another ten years or fifteen for the treatment to go through all the approved regulatory agencies and for all the working mechanisms involved to be studied fully - for we still don’t know much about how/why it works - just that it works but eventually we are going to be able to get commercially mass produced stem cells which can be injected in a wound site and the damaged part is going to heal over nicely without any sign of the original injury or scar.

I even got offers from one or two companies which are early pioneers in this business (start-ups) offering to supply me with stem cells for competitive rates at RS------for a million cells- the total dosage to be determined by the wound size and disease. Of course if I did buy them and use them on my patients it would have to be an experimental trial (clinical study) only and i would have to go through all the prescribed procedures for conducting such a trial prior to doing the treatment. Or I could wait till it becomes mainstream in a few more years and then start using it on my patients along with every other doctor.

As I said right at the beginning of this post, over the three days I was there at the conference I did feel slightly (well, a lot) envious of all the cutting edge advances taking place, more so from the fact that i too could have been one of those up on the podium getting the applause from the audience if only i had not been chased away from all research by the memory of my bitter experiences during college days.

For those readers who have been with this blog for some time I have in some of my past posts mentioned how when I was a promising young researcher working on my thesis some of my results were stolen in the pre-publication stage by a trusted mentor and I had to practice a scorched earth policy in making sure that no one, including me, could ever use that research anywhere. Not the wisest of options I guess- wasting two years of my hard work in the bargain but I simply wasn’t willing to sit back and allow myself to be cheated without fighting it to the bitter end.

Come to think of it now when i have a far more mature head on my shoulders I feel that I overreacted and let the shock of betrayal lead me to burn down the entire house to deal with a backstabbing rat but for good or bad I swore off research forever and decided to stick to clinical practice (and making money) for the rest of my life. So for years and years i have been happily practicing my cutting and sewing working with real patients instead of petri dishes and microscopes and making me a comfortable living in the bargain- but there is always a tiny bit of regret buried somewhere in my heart that i did not follow through with my research ambitions, especially when i attend conferences like these and see such cutting edge scientific advances.

I know it’s just presumptuous to assume that I might have been a success as a researcher but who knows? The future is a closed book to us and if destiny guides me to a path of research again I might even chuck my scalpel away and start ogling at microscopes. Even if I have to sacrifice some/lot of my current income and get accustomed to a lower standard of living just so future generations can benefit from my research findings. Besides there is a hidden thrill in research - that moment when you see the first evidence of your hunch being proven right- a sense of winning against your own doubts which is almost an orgiastic experience and it pays off for all the sacrifices you made till then.

So that’s all about the stem cell therapies i learned about recently which might provide a far more brighter and enriching life (disease-free) to future generations of humanity- so much so that I am tempted to label it "A New Hope" - a phrase familiar to all Star Wars fans. The future, ladies and gentlemen, looks far, far bright than the present. God bless us all.

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Professional Back Biting



Professional Back Biting

 

The other day one of my patients gave me a shock, a massive shock, with of all things a few dozen complimentary words praising me. If you are as surprised as i was, let me explain from the beginning. This was a 45 year old diabetic patient who had suffered from a variety of ailments for the past few months without suspecting that it was all linked together due to a single cause- her uncontrolled blood sugar levels. Early into listening to her recite a litany of complaints I suspected her of diabetes and told her get her blood sugar checked and meanwhile started her off on drugs for her current problems.

When she finally came in with her test reports confirming diabetes i had counseled her on having her blood sugar levels within accepted range at all times and then had referred her back to her family physician for further care. And promptly forgot all about her. Consider my surprise when she turned up again in my room after a few months. She had cajoled the nurses to let her in out of turn, walked straight in, sat down in front of me and said in an inappropriately loud voice "DOCTOR, I am so happy. I told my family members, I told people all over my street and I told everyone that I am now completely cured, that you have cured me of my diabetes".

I flinched from the shock of the unexpected blow and glanced around to see who all had overheard this emphatic denunciation. Relieved that none of my colleagues could have possibly heard it, I decided to prevent her from continuing in this same vein of unbridled enthusiasm and pushing myself up straighter from my customary slouch in the chair and told her in a firm voice "Madam, I did no such thing, as I told you before you cannot cure diabetes, you can merely control it". "But, but" she stammered "I checked my sugar level and it’s all gone".

With a sigh borne out of exhaustion at repeating the same thing for the 50th time that day, I slouched back again in my chair and went over the same grounds again "Madam, diabetes is a lifelong disease, you have to keep taking drugs all your life to keep your sugar levels under control. If not they will rise again". She nodded her head and seemed to have at last got the message. I concluded my lecture by telling her "So what has happened with you is that your blood sugar is normal only because of the medicines and will be normal as long as you continue taking them daily. Leave alone me, no one can cure diabetes, so if someone says he can please don’t believe it" and with that parting piece of advice I sent her on her way.

Now to explain why i was shocked at her emphatic appreciation on my skills in curing diabetes was because I remembered the times I have been part of a crowd of doctors who laughed over these absurd advertisements on curing diabetes published by quacks (fake doctors) in vernacular newspapers. The way these fake doctors cured diabetes is to convince a normal person (healthy/disease free person) that they have diabetes, take a blood sample for testing, switch it with a diabetic patients and show the gullible patient the false result.

Once the patient believes that they have the disease, these quacks go onto prescribe medicines made of secret ingredients which they will guarantee to cure diabetes and after a proper interval challenge the patient to go to any lab and get a sugar test done. Naturally their blood sugar level would be normal and when the patient sees the normal result they immediately believe that the secret medicine has cured their diabetes- which they never had in the first place. So a simple sleight of hand trick like magicians do is behind all these fake diabetes cures. Which is why I didn’t want to be labeled as one of them people who can "cure" diabetes.

Whenever we doctors get together and relax - like in the changing rooms of operation theatres between patients- we do tend to gossip a bit just like others do. And sometimes the gossip is about the way innocent patients get cheated by other doctors. Most of this gossip would be just unsubstantiated urban myths - like the one about how people who go to fertility clinics advertising 100% guaranteed child- often go home with someone else's kids because the sperm used has been switched with a healthy donors sperm- a very persistent myth you keep hearing often. But mostly it’s about the different ways unscrupulous doctors rip off patients- some of them wholly original inventions.  But all that talk is in the dressing room only- rarely do doctors wash dirty linen in public- like all other professions the medical field too maintains a distaste for exposing other doctors wrongdoings to outsiders. But things are changing. Doctors have started talking to their patients about other doctors- especially their previous attending doctors. And unsurprisingly whatever they tell patients about their previous doctors is mostly uncomplimentary and all about fault finding – or so says a new study.

The Journal of General Internal Medicine (May 2013 ed) has an article which analyzed the number of times doctors talk to patients about other doctors- the results were 29% of positive comments, 4% as neutral and 67% as negative comments critical about other doctors. As surprising as this fact is, I guess its happens more often than we think or acknowledge. Some doctor’s exhibit this instinctive need to breast beat their prowess when compared to their patient’s previous doctors. While others merely offer on or two cutting comments on the line of treatment or choice of drugs previously given by other doctors. None of which is wrong ethically but still a frowned upon practice under the dictum- thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow physician. But doctors are not the Sicilian mafia- there is no code of omerta and hence such doctors who constantly criticize other doctors rarely feel the need to temper their criticisms unless one or more of their patients goes back to confront their previous doctor and says flat out "my new physician says like this, like that, that what you did for me was wrong and you must be stupid" at which stage a battle royal ignites followed by a feud for generations.

Anyway, unlike the previous example of American doctors criticizing other doctors publicly, most doctors in India are wiser (or more discreet) and rarely (never) tell their patients outright that such and such a doctor is bad. It’s all mostly winks and nudges when a patient asks about another doctor. It ranges from “well, I have not heard anything of him till now – which really means- anything good till now” to “why don’t you try someone else, I heard his success rate is not good- which really means half is patients die so why take the risk” all of which is trying to pass the message as subtly as possible that “although I would love to share the horror stories I have heard of the doctor you are asking about, I can’t come right out and say it because my professional ethics forbids me”. Some patients are wise enough to understand the subtle hints and knowing winks. Others are not. So the next time you ask your family physician about another doctor- please watch out for those tell tale signs and subtle winks.

The point of this post is - like all professional relationships the doctor patient relationship is based on trust and it works only if there is absolute trust both ways – second guessing leads to a lot of avoidable tragedies. Hence unnecessarily back biting colleagues and bad mouthing other doctor’s to our patients leads to an overall collapse of trust in all doctors, in the medical profession itself, which would be a tragedy for both patients and doctors. Likewise doctors have a duty to prevent their patients from getting bad treatment by incompetent doctors. But there are ways to do this properly- constructive criticism rather than negative criticism is the way forward. It helps if doctors keep gossiping about colleagues to a minimum- but I guess that we are all human and apt to slip up now and then. So the only way to do this ethically – is for doctors to directly call the other doctor and query him/her if they feel that their patient has received sub-standard care rather than badmouth to the patient. Both as a doctor and as a patient I would appreciate this gesture as it would lead to a solution rather than just blame. So what do you think? I would love to hear your views on this sensitive topic.

And to conclude- I can advice, counsel, prescribe for diabetes- but I cannot cure it and neither can anyone else at this point of time, ok?