Evidence Based Medicine Vs. Intuition
I happened to read this interesting article here
(Evidence-Based Medicine: What's the Evidence? http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.21968/full) on Evidence based medicine and re-appraisal
of its evolution and growth to becoming the centrality of medical practice.
Medicine has always depended on empirical evidence (as has science- despite what
the creation science/intelligent design supporters say) but only recently has
the concept of evidence based medicine become absolutely indispensable to the
everyday practice of medicine beating out clinical acumen, clinical experience
and that most elusive of holies- gut feel.
Don’t get me wrong…I love evidence based medicine- despite the fact
that my professors in my PG years made me learn by heart the top 100 authors/
researchers (of best articles) in my specialty and their areas of current
research and any paradigm altering scientific evidence they produced….you could
have woken me up in my sleep and I would have told you what Dr’s Beverly Dale,
Kolebrander, Isao Ishikawa were up to till the previous week…but that didn’t
make me an expert on evidence based medicine- it was purely exam oriented
training.
But as I started my research works for my master’s thesis and I came
into contact with research methodology and those twin towers of medical
research- “p” value and odds ratio- I felt the first twinges of disquiet. As
the eminent researcher K.A.Fisher pointed out – statistics are just
probabilities – they are not certainties and the whole edifice of medicine was
based on these research papers as if they were the infallible truth. With the
advent of internet medicine and patients armed with reams of printouts from
dubious medical websites, we are often forced to practice safe medicine- go for
the most defensible prescription- always keeping in mind a potential lawsuit in
the future (years later -when we have
forgotten all about it).
It wasn’t always like this. When I was young and getting my usual quota
of childhood diseases- we alternated between two doctors to treat my childhood
ailments. One was a famous General Physician
called Dr.Venkatesh Pai of George Town, Madras, a schoolmate of my grandfather
(in the 1930’s)– who had treated my grandfather, my father and when he finally
came down to me- he was the very definition of a family doctor- old, wizened,
wise and absolutely authoritative. Patients used to wait in droves outside his
palatial bungalow cum clinic and he used to dispense his own compositions- the compounder
at the attached pharmacy handed out colored bottles and powders of unknown
provenance which used to work wonders- mainly because patients believed that he
had the special “gift of the hand”- the Rashi of curing any patient he saw….a
placebo belief which was more powerful than any medicine he dispensed.
The other doctor my parents used to take me to was for emergencies- a
brash young Paediatrician just starting to make a name for himself in the
profession, a Dr.Vishwanath of Nungambakkam, Chennai who was a great believer
in symptomatic treatment, in reducing high-fevers in no time, with anti-pyretic
injections and corticosteroids. When I started my own clinical practice I begun
to understand his line of treatment better- as parents insist on and expect
nothing less than immediate success when it comes to children- they don’t
appreciate the take this medicine and wait for it to work line. Like every
recently graduated doc, he plied me with all the latest drugs on the market-
stuff which my other physician would never ever consider. Between these two
extremes of treatment, I somehow survived unscathed and lived to write this
post.
My next brush with the (un)certainties of modern medicine came when I
was in Tanjore Medical College. I used to hang out with a bunch of
Oto-Rhino-Laryngologist’s, better known as ENT Surgeons (in fact, I was dating
one of them – a PG student which gave me privileged access to the inner sanctum)
and I used to hear a lot of gossip about current advances in their specialty.
The ENT docs considered Adenoids/tonsils and all accessory lymphoid tissues as
purely vestigial and were forever recommending their removal...So much so, that
a standing joke among the other doctors was that ENT docs don’t do surgery for tonsillitis
(the disease) but for tonsils (normal). This was purely based on current
Evidence Based Medicine which said that you don’t need your tonsils for normal,
everyday life (along with appendix/wisdom teeth etc)- which gave a fillip to
the cut it and throw it out group. This again prompted me to have vague doubts
about the vagaries in interpretation of evidence based medicine.
The point I am trying to make is if the practice of medicine was just
about writing out a prescription- based on current available best evidence -
given a set of symptoms…then any robotic interface can do a better job than
even the best trained human. It’s that intangible something called clinical
experience, acumen or gut feels which separates robotic medicine from human
medicine. For example antibiotics like Co-trimoxazole or Erythromycin have
never gone out of circulation, but is there any recent prescription where you
have seen them? I have not. The bad reputation these drugs have acquired as
becoming ineffective or susceptible to resistant organisms is purely word of
mouth gossip over conference lunches and canteen coffees. And practioners have
moved onto newer generations of antibiotics for even simpler infections
precisely because they have faith on them based on the grapevine rather than
any hard evidence or double-blind, gold-plated RCT studies. And of course, when
compelling evidence shows us clearly what works or not- we do accept it and
change promptly.
So, tell me all, is your practice based solely on best evidence or do
you give credence to your inner voice? Your experience, your acumen, your
gut-feel when it comes to deciding what works or maybe will work better for
that particular patient?
(P.S. this post is based on personal beliefs and is being published on
a personal blog in my personal capacity- and not in a peer-reviewed, indexed
journal- hence I don’t have to produce voluminous, hard data, to substantiate
my beliefs which I stated here…feel free to comment and I will reply..If you
feel the need to debate-please excuse)
EBM is another gimmick (in my opinion) that the medical profession is adopting to keep its turf clear. It could also be a ploy of the big pharmas (who fund the RCTs) for marketing their products.
ReplyDeleteWhile I'm certainly in favour of the scientific method, I'm a little skeptical about how reliable scientific the evidence is. Anyday I'll go with good old clinical acumen and trust in the, now extinct, family doctor's diagnosis.
Illuminating post Ganesh.
-V
Informative article, just what I needed.
ReplyDeleteFeel free to surf to my web blog http://wiki.ec-hasslau.de
my website - weight loss
Wow that was odd. I just wrote an incredibly long comment but after I clicked
ReplyDeletesubmit my comment didn't show up. Grrrr... well I'm not writing
all that over again. Anyhow, just wanted to say superb
blog!
My blog post; weight loss
First off I want to say awesome blog! I had a quick question in which I'd like to ask if you don't mind.
ReplyDeleteI was interested to find out how you center yourself and clear
your mind before writing. I've had difficulty clearing my mind in getting my ideas out there. I do take pleasure in writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are generally wasted just trying to figure out how to begin. Any recommendations or tips? Thanks!
Also visit my weblog - weight management programs
Also see my website :: quick weight loss diets
Very great post. I simply stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your weblog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing on your feed and I am hoping you write again very soon!
ReplyDelete